Abstract #
This paper investigates the stability of slopes subjected to surcharge, utilizing both Limit Equilibrium Methods (LEM) and Finite Element Method (FEM). The study employs GEO5 software to analyze the response of homogeneous and layered soil slopes, comparing the results from LEM (Bishop, Fellenius, and Spencer methods) with those from FEM using the Shear Strength Reduction (SSR) technique. The analysis demonstrates that FEM generally yields higher factors of safety compared to LEM, with the Drucker-Prager yield criterion providing more conservative results than the Mohr-Coulomb model. The study also examines the influence of mesh size and the effect of surcharge distance on slope stability.
Technical Relevance #
This document is highly relevant for geotechnical engineers and researchers involved in slope stability analysis, particularly in situations where surcharges are applied. The comparison of traditional LEM approaches with the more advanced FEM technique provides valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of each method, making it a crucial resource for those seeking to optimize slope design and safety.
Target Audience #
The document is intended for geotechnical engineers, civil engineers, researchers, and professionals involved in slope stability analysis and design. It is particularly useful for those working on projects where slopes are subjected to additional loads, such as foundations near slopes, bridge abutments, and earth dams.
Software and Methodology #
The stability analysis was conducted using GEO5 software, applying both LEM and FEM approaches. The LEM analysis used Bishop’s, Fellenius’s, and Spencer’s methods to calculate the Factor of Safety (FoS) for slopes under surcharge. For FEM, the study employed the Shear Strength Reduction (SSR) technique, which progressively reduces the shear strength parameters of the soil until failure occurs. The analysis considered both homogeneous and layered soil models, with variations in mesh size and surcharge position to assess their impact on slope stability.
Process Description #
The paper begins with an introduction to the importance of slope stability analysis, especially under surcharge conditions. It describes the setup of the numerical models, including the selection of soil properties, geometric configurations, and boundary conditions. The study then outlines the steps taken in both LEM and FEM analyses, highlighting the differences in how each method approaches the calculation of FoS. The process includes a detailed examination of the mesh effects on FEM results and the influence of surcharge distance from the slope crest on stability.
Main Findings #
The study finds that FEM generally provides higher and more conservative FoS values compared to LEM, particularly when using the Drucker-Prager yield criterion. The analysis also reveals that the position of the surcharge relative to the slope crest significantly affects the FoS, with stability improving as the distance increases. Additionally, the study notes that finer mesh sizes in FEM lead to more conservative FoS values, but the effect becomes negligible beyond a certain mesh density.
Practical Applications #
The findings from this study are directly applicable to the design and analysis of slopes in various geotechnical projects, particularly where surcharges are involved. Engineers can use the insights gained to select the most appropriate analysis method and ensure that slope designs are both safe and cost-effective. The study also provides practical guidance on the selection of mesh size in FEM and the placement of surcharges to optimize slope stability.
Limitations and Considerations #
The document acknowledges that the accuracy of the stability analysis depends on the quality of the input data, particularly soil parameters and mesh configurations. Engineers should conduct thorough site investigations and consider local geological conditions when applying these findings to their projects. The study also emphasizes the need for continuous monitoring during construction to validate the model’s predictions and adjust the design as necessary.
Conclusions #
The paper concludes that FEM, particularly when using the SSR technique, offers a more reliable and conservative approach to slope stability analysis compared to traditional LEM methods. The study highlights the importance of considering the effects of surcharge distance and mesh size in FEM, providing valuable insights for geotechnical engineers aiming to optimize slope stability under complex loading conditions. The results suggest that FEM should be preferred in scenarios where high accuracy and safety are critical.
Related Resources #
Further reading includes studies on the application of LEM and FEM in slope stability analysis, research on the effects of surcharges on slope stability, and case studies on the use of SSR in geotechnical engineering. Additional resources on the calibration of geotechnical models and the impact of mesh configurations in FEM can provide deeper insights into optimizing slope stability assessments.
📥 Download LINK
